Notifications can be turned off anytime from settings.
Item(s) Added To cart
Qty.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and try again.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and try again.
Exchange offer not applicable. New product price is lower than exchange product price
Please check the updated No Cost EMI details on the payment page
Exchange offer is not applicable with this product
Exchange Offer cannot be clubbed with Bajaj Finserv for this product
Product price & seller has been updated as per Bajaj Finserv EMI option
Please apply exchange offer again
Your item has been added to Shortlist.
View AllYour Item has been added to Shopping List
View AllSorry! The Battle of Belmont is sold out.
You will be notified when this product will be in stock
|
Brief Description
The battle of Belmont was the first battle in the western theater of the Civil War and, more importantly, the first battle of the war fought by Ulysses S. Grant. The battle cost some twenty percent of Grant's troops, but as a result of this engagement he became known as an audacious fighting general. Nathaniel Hughes provides the only full-length tactical study of the battle that catapulted Grant into prominence. Throughout the narrative, Hughes draws sketches of the lives and fates of individual soldiers who fought on both sides, especially of the colorful and enormously dissimilar principal actors, Grant and Polk.
Learn More about the Book
The battle of Belmont was the first battle in the western theater of the Civil War and, more importantly, the first battle of the war fought by Ulysses S. Grant. It set a pattern for warfare not only in the Mississippi Valley but at Fort Donelson and Shiloh as well. Grant's 7 November 1861 strike against the Southern forces at Belmont, in southeastern Missouri on the Mississippi River, made use of the newly outfitted Yankee timberclads and all the infantry available at the staging area in Cairo, Illinois.
The Confederates, led by Leonidas Polk and Gideon Pillow, had the advantages of position and superior numbers. They hoped to smash Grant's expeditionary force on the Missouri shore and cut off the escape of the Illinois and Iowa troops from their boats. The confrontation was a bloody, all-day fight that a veteran of a dozen major battles would later call "frightful to contemplate." At first successful, the Federals were eventually driven from the field and withdrew up the Mississippi to safety. The battle cost some twenty percent of his troops, but as a result of this engagement Grant became known as an audacious fighting general.
Using diaries and letters of participants, official documents, and contemporary newspaper accounts, Nathaniel Hughes provides the only full-length tactical study of the battle that catapulted Grant into prominence. Throughout the narrative, Hughes draws sketches of the lives and fates of individual soldiers who fought on both sides, especially of the colorful and enormously dissimilar principal actors, Grant and Polk.
The battle of Belmont was the first battle in the western theater of the Civil War and, more importantly, the first battle of the war fought by Ulysses S. Grant. At first successful, the Federals were eventually driven from the field and withdrew up the Mississippi to safety. The battle cost some twenty percent of Grant's troops, but as a result of this engagement he became known as an audacious fighting general. Nathaniel Hughes provides the only full-length tactical study of the battle that catapulted Grant into prominence. Throughout the narrative, Hughes draws sketches of the lives and fates of individual soldiers who fought on both sides, especially of the colorful and enormously dissimilar principal actors, Grant and Polk.
Review Quotes
1. A lively and authoritative account for all adult readers.
"Choice"
2. Will gain a coveted place in Civil War historiography as the authoritative work on this battle.
"Choice"
3. A detailed and absorbing work on this early engagement in the western theater of the Civil War.
Charles P. Roland, University of Kentucky
4. This is a lively account, as well researched as it is well written.
James I. Robertson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
5. The most complete account yet of this little-studied battle.
--"The Journal of Southern History"
The images represent actual product though color of the image and product may slightly differ.
Register now to get updates on promotions and
coupons. Or Download App